Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2 +2013%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Oct 2008
FirePro Server
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

265W
TDP
90W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
G94
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy