Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +213%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Server
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GA100
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy