Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +1899%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
5376
112
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 31
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy