Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +3126%
3.226 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF119
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy