Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD FirePro S9100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9100 +10717%
4.219 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
18W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy