Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FireGL V7600

AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FireGL V7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +1220%
5.069 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
4
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
R600
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
R600 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
127W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy