Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD FirePro S9150
VS
ATI FirePro V3900
AMD FirePro S9150
ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2336 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +712%
5.069 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
480
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Turks
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy