AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 17.02GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
+2540%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
266 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
17.02GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
2816
Shading Units
64
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
235W
TDP
95W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
G94
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
