Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +1162%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Dec 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2816
Shading Units
192
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT200B
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy