Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +64%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Fiji
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy