Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +741%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
0.949 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
576
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.888 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.55 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
949.2 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.55 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
GK106
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
GK106-200-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy