ATI FirePro V3700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (15.20GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
+42%
0.064 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
40
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GT218
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
