Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

ATI FirePro V3700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +6800%
4.416 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
40
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
TU116
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net