ATI FirePro V3700 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
18136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+142181%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
40
Shading Units
18176
4
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD102
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
