ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+3680%
19.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
4096
20
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
DG2-512
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
