Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +54%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 OEM
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
192
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.500 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
14.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GK107
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy