Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +210%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Tobago
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy