Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FireGL V7700

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FireGL V7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +25%
0.624 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV670
Turks GL
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy