Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GS

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +1542%
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GS
0.038 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Apr 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
480
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.08 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
G84
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy