Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 115W)
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X +215%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
115W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Bonaire
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy