Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6350 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800 +496%
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6350
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2011
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
2
400
Shading Units
80
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Cedar
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy