Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +560%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
32
400
Shading Units
2048
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Tahiti
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy