Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs Intel Arc A770

ATI FirePro V4900 vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +2459%
19.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
DG2-512
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy