Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +1728%
0.768 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV610
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy