Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +1027%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
205W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 10
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy