Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2589MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6600 XT +1280%
10.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jul 2021
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1968 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2589 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.7 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.21 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.60 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
662.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 23
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 23 XT (215-130000006)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy