ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+1044%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
800
Shading Units
4480
40
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
74W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Juniper
GPU Name
GA100
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
