ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD FirePro W9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
+261%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
74W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Juniper
GPU Name
Tahiti
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
