Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 74W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +986%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
AD107
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy