Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +2366%
12.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
320
Shading Units
4480
32
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GA100
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net