Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 8400 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750 +1665%
0.512 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 SE
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

76W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
G86S
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy