Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (76W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +21%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
G92B
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy