Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800 vs ATI FirePro V4900

ATI FirePro V7800 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800 +162%
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
480
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Turks
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy