Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD FireStream 9250

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI +85%
1.856 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV770
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy