Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI +866%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jul 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
3
1280
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV630
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x SDI
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy