Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +92%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
12
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x SDI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy