Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI +130%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Oland
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy