Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +2%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Mar 2015
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy