ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon RX 590
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590
+283%
7.119 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cayman
GPU Name
Polaris 30
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT
(215-0922006)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
