Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 263W)
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7800 XT +1910%
37.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
583.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
74.65 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.32 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1166 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
263W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 32
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32 XT (215-180000006)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy