Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +188%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
800
Shading Units
128
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

151W
TDP
135W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
G92
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy