Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +795%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy