Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 151W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

151W
TDP
44W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
RV535
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
TeraScale
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy