Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +2127%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
800
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy