Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (106W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750 +166%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
800
Shading Units
144
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GF116
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy