Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X +1%
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy