Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +7%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1176 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.43 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GM206
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GTX 960 OEM
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy