Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +1643%
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1600
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
G94B
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy