Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +220%
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 OEM
0.848 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1600
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.25 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
847.9 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
106.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GF110
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF110-040-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy