Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +2515%
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Dec 2011
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
80
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Cedar
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy